Please read over the thoughts and successes of some of our current members. Should you wish to contribute a testimonial of your own, please e-mail us at
testimonials@aussiespeedingfines.com

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it.





Hi Guys,

I thought you might like this one from South Australia. I wrote in explaining that I was not the driver and did not know who was and could not fill out a Stat Dec/Nomination form as I was not sure who was driving, this was the response I got:

Notice of Amendment of Expiation Notice

I refer to Expiation Notice Number: ********* - Registration Number: ******

On behalf of the Commissioner of Police, I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence regarding the above Expiation Notice.

Your submission has been considered together with the relevant documentation and I can find no evidence to suggest that the offence was detected and reported incorrectly. However, taking all factors into consideration the notice has been amended to a “Caution”.

Please be advised that this was done under discretionary authority and should any future transgressions occur the same degree of leniency may not be shown.

Chief Inspector John Burgess
Manager
Expiation Notice Branch

Thanks again for all the information and assistance,

Michael – S.A.

It is my contention that speeding fines should be abolished altogether.

If someone is driving 110 in a 100kmh zone and the police consider it dangerous, then the charge should be dangerous driving. But they won’t do this as it would further show the fallacy of their arguments.  There is no doubt in my mind that speed cameras cause accidents.

Until I discovered Aussie Speeding Fines, I spent too much time concentrating on my speedo, and not enough time concentrating on driving safely. Now I concentrate on the road, and will back off the pedal a little when my GPS beeps, but I am now a safer driver.

I have not yet received a speeding offence notice, but now have no concerns. If it happens, I know how to deal with it. Thank you ASF for making me a safer driver.

Leo

Hi Guys,

Keep fighting.

My experience after getting a ticket for speeding from two cops who had parked themselves on a Give Way sign at 2100hrs was interesting.

I asked to see the Calibration Certificate for the Ultralyte they used, one of them laughed and asked if I had been watching Current Affair, to which I replied 'NO'. I was shown a QPS label on the side of the gun, I recorded all the information on the label.

After many events I ended up in court and was handed the police Brief of Evidence. This is where it got really interesting, as one cop stated that I was travelling south, the other said I was travelling north ! All at the same time. Next the number of the gun that they and their boss quoted was NOT the gun that they used on the night in question !

At the last court appearance a hearing date was set, then the prosecutor asked to speak to me outside. I was advised that if I wanted to use calibration as a defence that I would have to lodge a 'Notice to Challenge'. I advised the prosecutor that it would not be necessary because of the information contained in the Brief of Evidence. I got three phone calls after that, one asking for the gun details, and two to say that the court date was being 'vacated'. End of story.

Make sure you get as much information as possible when you get your ticket!

Phil.

Hi guys,

Thanks for your advice!

I followed the 3 step process in relation to an unjust parking fine and even warned them that I would take the matter on to the county court. Then, at the last minute the council backed down from taking me to the Magistrate’s court.

Cheers,

Nathan  (Vic)

Dear Sir,

I've tried out your nice little letter that is on your website with regards to the parking.  I can happily report that the piece of paper actually works and has done so for me 3 times !

I've left my car parked right in the middle of the city (Melbourne) and everyone around me has had a ticket issued to them where my car has not, even after 1.5 hours over the time limit (all 3 times I've done it) !!!

That is proof of pudding of what you are doing and is the reason why I've become a member because your stuff just works.  Its great!

Kind regards,

Pete.

Hi guys,

Great news about the court decision regarding the evading police. Another reason for them to hate me, because I wont stop in future... LOL ... 

What do I do if they point a gun at me?
 
I am a long time user of your methods with great success. I haven’t paid a speed or parking fine in 10 years and have won outright in more than a dozen cases in the S.A magistrates court.... Happy to provide case numbers for you if you want, I have had costs awarded to me in amounts from $200 to $4500.
 
Admittedly they all came down to the statute of limitations argument, but a win is a win and I have a reputation here now ... LOL. Most of the Magistrates pooh pooh your 3 letters, but they have repeatedly allowed me to run the issue beyond 6 months 28 days before they charge me, then one prosecutor after another is convinced they can push aside the limitations argument, which they cant, to their disgust and expense, I am getting to be a bit of a expert in the issue now.

Many thanks once again and feel free to use this as a testimonial..
 
Yours sincerely
 
David – S.A.
 
PS. I notice that the vehicles I have your stickers on don’t seem to be recieving fines ??? has anybody else thought this ?

Hi Guys,

I trust this e-mail finds you all well. I just thought I’d share with you another BIG win that I had in court today that you might like to pass on.

It all started out with a $1.79 Eastlink Toll Invoice and ended up with me not only having the case withdrawn against me but also being awarded $150 in costs – yep, I got almost 10 times back in costs what they were trying to originally sting me for!

I used your info and combined it with a bit of my own knowledge and fought it for about 18 months but yesterday, the 2nd of December, I finally beat them and got costs awarded in my favour at the Dandenong Magistrate’s Court. You are welcome to look up the case, its number B11068860 and I encourage you to upload this e-mail to your website – I’m happy for you to include my name - because I know that people still have doubts about your information and I can assure them that it absolutely works and my day in court today is the perfect proof of that.

You might also want to know that, I used your 3 step process, which they ignored; I elected to have the matter heard in court, which they also ignored; then had an Enforcement Order issued against me, which I applied to have revoked, which they also denied and it wasn’t until I got in front of a Magistrate that things started turning around in my favour.

She took one look at the 60 page affidavit I prepared which raised all the issues about toll companies being private entities, the police not being able to prosecute over a civil debt, the Enforcement Order being illegal and void pursuant to section 8, sub-section 12 of the Imperial Acts Application Act etc and immediately granted my revocation application and suggested to the Prosecutor that they really didn’t want to pursue this case “did they”?

And the rest, as outlined above, is history! So, tell your people that, no matter how much these “authorities” deny what you say and tell you you’ll never win, if you keep standing up for your rights, justice will prevail in the end!

As always, thanks for all your tireless efforts keeping everyone informed of new breakthroughs and ways to fight these evil and corrupt revenue raising bastards!

Have a safe and happy Christmas!

Mike Palmer

P.S. As you guys know, I spend a lot of my time in New Zealand now and people should know that your information works just as effectively over there too!

Hello Team,
 
I purchased your E book, and not long after got a speeding fine.  I’m a courier so I drive for a living.  I tried your 3 step process, and delivered a hand written letter direct to the fines counter in William St - to make sure they got it and asked for a receipt from the counter.  They responded (twice) only a few days before payment was due, to say that they were withdrawing the fine and demerit points–due to my good driving record - and issued an official warning instead. 

Excellent.  Before I had read your book, I probably would have done as they hoped I would – just paid up.  Thanks to your book – $153 and a demerit point saved.
 
Regards,

Richard (Vic.)

Just to let u guys know I have printed the 'parking fine warning notice' and taped it to the inside of my sprinter van windscreen.

I love it, the amount of people that walk past and stop to spend the time to read it is amazing. Of course I haven't received a fine since and let me tell you I not one to obey the stupid signs, with a high roof (3m) van its hard to find on-street parking in the Adelaide CBD.

I have had 3 court cases now against speeding fines with a mix of results and more pending plus fighting a parking fine. I'll spend the time soon to let you know of the results.

Keep up the good work.

Ryan.

Hi guys,

Just to let you know that I used your three step process on a speed fine I got in feb this year. Sent the letters as per your book first then received a letter back to say I had to pay up, (and lose my points ).

I then used your court election letter as I did not receive a cert no for the laser device being used, (weights and measurement act). That was over three months ago and as yet have not been given a court date or even had any more correspondence from any departments concerned.

Guess it’s been quietly put in the too hard basket. So thanks for the info guys and keep up the great work.

Cheers,

Marc

PS . I stuck your stickers wherever I could put them…

Hi aussiespeedfines people,
 
It would have been good to have seen this before our court case today!

Anyway, hubby did well. He received four fines from the same fixed camera, all within a couple of weeks of each other, from December 2010 to January 2011 (double demerits). We didn't use the letters in your three step process, but we did elect to have all of them heard in court, had the initial listing adjourned, and as I said, the case was heard today.

The court listed all four to be heard together. As we already knew, the court will automatically accept the prosecution evidence as correct, and the onus is on the defendant to disprove their evidence. Extremely difficult, when the magistrate says straight away that they are satisfied that the prosecution have proved their case before we have even had a chance to say much more than our name and confirm why we are there. Nevertheless, hubby is not easily intimidated, and proceeded to question the 'camera operator' (stupid term, as it was a fixed device and therefore operates on its own).

We had scrutinised the four fines, and two of them had obvious anomolies. Those two pieces of legal document both stated a fine for '10km and under', but on the same document it listed the speed zone as 60km and the speed detected as 71km and 73km. What the....?? When I went to school, 60 from 71 is 11! The prosecution witness was not happy that hubby pointed this out, and he used that argument to attempt to discredit all four fines, stating that these contradictions should show reasonable doubt in the accuracy of that particular fixed camera. Of course, prosecution produced one witness to testify that the camera was operating efficiently and had been tested within acceptable guidelines.

Hubby then did as I suggested, and made a statement explaining that he drives for a living, has an immaculate record for the last 15 years, and if these fines are designed to alter driver behaviour, that he hadn't been given a chance to, seeing as he didn't know that he may have been doing something wrong or that he may need to have his speedometer recalibrated, as he received the first fine after the last alleged offence. He asked for all four fines to be reduced to just one. He didn't get that outcome....but....he got the first two dismissed and both were the double demerits, double fine.

The outcome was 4 reduced to 2, and the judge dismissed the most expensive ones. We consider that a win, as our day in court showed us that the cards are stacked in their favour. Nevertheless, we saved 8 demerit points and $500.00. The judge made it clear that she accepted the prosecutions evidence, and stated that we didn't show 'reasonable doubt', even though she acknowledged the anomolies that we pointed out. She stated that she based her decision on his good driving record.

There are quite a few websites that are calling your website a scam. Well, if it is then it's a very useful one. We have delayed any penalty for more than six months with some tips obtained from your e-book, and we have managed a win, of sorts. We wouldn't have even thought to fight this if we hadn't discovered your website.

Just to make it clear how absurd these fines were, the fixed camera that 'caught' hubby four times in three weeks is located on Parramatta Road, Auburn, in Sydney, and actual speeds that motorists can travel at during the day is what can only be described as 'a crawl'.

Please feel free to post this in your testimonials.

Thanks for your information and support, and we feel that subscribing to your e-book was money well spent. Even though the court system is clearly prejudiced, if you believe that you are right, have the guts to stand up for yourself, and present your arguments honestly, you just may get some kind of justice.

Linda - NSW
 


Dear Aussie Speeding Fines,
 
I have also have a testimony - feel free to post it if you like:

I was recently ticketed via the post (for the first time since successfully beating a speeding fine just over 2 years ago using your much valued e-book's very informative and absolutely trustworthy information) by a multanova model 6Fcamera whist travelling at 99 Km/h as indicated on my speedometer ( interestingly, my GPS showed 90Km/h - it has always showed my speedo to read 9 Km/h too high from the day I bought it) in a 100 Km/h zone (this is posted very clearly at regular intervals).

The infringement alleged I was travelling at 109 Km/h. Armed with your "ammunition" and with notes I took directly from the multanova manual I viewed whilst under the supervision of a traffic senior-constable here in WA. I was lucky to have found this officer through a mutual friend of 15 years who is also a very high ranking police inspector. Whilst viewing the manual, one cannot make photo-copies, but may take as many notes as they please in the presence of this senior constable's watchful eyes (he also made sure my mobile phone was turned off as to stop any possibility of me taking photos!).

My court date came up (I used your e-book's form to elect a court hearing instead of using the back of the police' infringement notice). I had a very thick folder under my arm with "Multanova 6F" clearly written on it. When the prosecutor tried to get me to plea guilty before the trial, he asked me what was in that folder so I only replied with "you will find out soon enough. I'm also applying for costs to be awarded to me". When my hearing commenced, the prosecutor told the magistrate they were withdrawing the infringement. That was it! I was free to go - no demerits or fine.

I was a happy lad indeed and only have one regret; I didn't push for costs to be awarded to myself. I'll save that for next time. The ever-building negative exposure of these flawed revenue raising devices (so called "safety cameras" - what a joke!) may, hopefully, thwart the possibility of another unlawful infringement to be slapped on me ever again. May that day soon come for all that drive on Australian roads.
 
As an after-thought, I have to wonder if it would be helpful for anyone to carry a folder filled with paperwork on any subject at all having the camera type prominently written on the outside. I'm sure that alone would make any police prosecutor nervous enough to think twice before proceeding with the trial, lest they make a fool of themselves!
 
Thanks Aussie speeding fines - that's 2 wins in three years!
 
Bill - W.A.

            

Today I was opposing my two speeding fines (around $150 and $300 worth).

My defence, based on the ebook from www.aussiespeedingfines.com was a total success – both cases dismissed.

Charles

Hi Guys,

I won my case against the local government.  They have no authority.  The member at the State Administrative Tribunal stated that some of what he has said will not be in the transcript as it is not in the best interest to SAT as they too are in the same situation as local government.  They too have no real authority to lay down the law.  The thing is we actually do need this form of mediation between government and commonwealth.  I have been invited to many events of late to assist others but I don't have the time as much as I would love to.

Donna – WA

Hi Aussie Speeding Fines,

I have good news as the Magistrate today listened to reason and I won my case with the parking fine.

The stressed out prosecutor was concerned if they had run the case would I really have used the "unconstitutional" defense?

He warned me that the $5.00 internet letters don't work...He may be right or wrong the point is I had won my day in court and they had 5 people in court to just defend the case.

Thanks again to Aussie Speeding Fines.

Andrew – Vic.

Hello,

I just received this letter today. After following the steps in your book it seems I have beat them. I have attached letter to show you.

I was apparently caught speeding by a highway patrol car doing 115 in a 100 zone. He asked why I was speeding and just said I was not speeding. After several attempts of him trying to get me to admit I was speeding, he then asked me to look at the police radar device that had 115 kmh on the screen and I asked him where is the photo of my car that shows me speeding. He said it was my car that made that reading but as far as I am concerned that 115 could have been on the screen all day and booking people for it ? Who knows without evidence ?

Sper finally stepped in and I did what the book said and they then sent a letter ignoring my initial request about the court hearing so I responded with another copy that I sent earlier and told them that I have noted that they ignored my first letter.

I sent everything by Platinum Post except for the last letter to Sper as they made sure that I had no time to post a letter in response so I faxed the last one to them.

I am STOKED that people have won again against this corrupt system.

Kind regards,

Rob – QLD

The reply from SPER was as follows:

Dear Mr ……

Thank you for your facsimile received at the State Penalties Enforcement Registry (SPER) on 15 August 2011 about infringement notice number …….

This infringement was recalled from SPER by the Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) on 13 august 2011 and is no longer outstanding with this office.

Yours sincerely,

Registrar SPER

G'day ASF.

You probably don't remember but I was railroaded, as you put it, and fined an extra $646.00 in court for an $86.00 'not carry license' offence. I challenged it again at the higher district court and beat it this time. The Judge overturned her decision and said it was the most ridiculous thing he had heard that week and even congratulated me for fighting the fine! I couldn't believe it.

I also challenged and won the case concerning a parking fine of $201.00 where the pathetic parking officer in Surry Hills hunting for quotas photographed me while I was moving on the street and sent the fine in the mail! The Magistrate actually acknowledged the difference between a road rule and a crime and along with my circumstance she dumped the whole penalty in front of the parking officer who had to turn up and embarrass herself in court. I have won all my unjust fines so far 5 all together. Thanks and keep up the motivation!

Use this email for a testimonial if you want to.

All the best.

Emmanuel.

Dear Team,

Many thanks for your prompt attention in sending my E-book and resource disk which I have read through several times.  

As you are probably aware there is a plethora non-genuine Aussie Speeding Fines Sites, some of which are definitely against Aussie Speeding Fines, giving misleading information and outright lies, which I checked into as I needed to know if your organization had anything of value to say and you were not just another bunch Scam Merchants. As I went through some of these sites I found one that said you were giving misleading information about the All Capitals Names. Well I fully understand the significance of this scam that governments are using to enslave the Sovereign People of Australia and the rest of the world under Admiralty or Fleet Law.

Long story short, I did not mind at paying for you product, because it’s the right thing to do for something of value, and it is valuable.

Yours Sincerely

Keith – S.A.

Hey ASF team!!

It's fantastic to hear what is going on around the country with cameras being turned off. How exciting!!

I have some great news!!

I had mentioned to you guys a couple of months back about my mum's fine in Mill Park where she was alleged to have turned right on a red arrow, at the intersection of Childs road and Redleap avenue on the way to work in May, last year.

After hours of trying to help mum understand what to say in court... she at least was able to point out that they fined her under two separate road rules because the cops made a mistake on the summons sheet, and when they gave different statements in court, it was even more suspicious.

Her fine did ended up getting withdrawn, but the judge, of course, wouldn’t make the cops look bad, so he put the finding down to her good driving history over the past 40 years, and giving her a 3 month good behaviour bond...and we are to donate $100 to the Alfred Hospital road trauma fund... Which is better than 3 demerit points and a $350 fine.

So anyway, that was a win thanks to ASF!!

Alexandros – Vic.

Hi Guys,

Firstly thanks for all your support, after I brought your e book. GO ASF!!

After 22 months of legal heart ache we finally won our speeding case YYYYYeha!!!! In COURT.

Just a bit of back ground if you publish this. My son, then 17, red QLD P Plater, was booked in Northern NSW going over 153km per hr in a 110 zone.

Magistrates Court found him Guilty, and was shocked at this complete Kangaroo court. Magistrate said” the evidence was overwhelming”. Sentence was big fine and, of course, suspension.

We appealed to the district Court and won. Firstly, had he, (my son) been speeding you would not be seeing the email.

Armed with more facts and info than I needed thanks to ASF, we tipped this complete false charge on its head. We used all the police evidence as our weapon to prove to the District Court that the Police Officers average speed over the distance was only at best 120km ph - that’s right 120kmph. By using time in motion math’s, and the police video evidence and statement.

Long story short the Judge said “based on the evidence before this court, I couldn’t find anyone guilty! And the police evidence at best was fanciful”, Justice served. 

Big thanks to ASF.

Kind Regards,

Grant

G’day Aussie Speeding Fines,

Just wanted to thank you for the information in the ebook regarding our rights etc

I received a speed camera detected fine in the post and I followed the advice given regarding nominating a driver if I couldn’t be 100% sure who was driving etc.

After receiving a letter stating that I HAD to nominate a driver, I replied stating I did not want to falsify a Stat Dec and therefore could not supply the driver accurately.

The final correspondence I received basically said they had dropped it!!! 

Wooohooo, a win for the Australian road users.

Anthony – QLD

Following your instructions I have had four infringements withdrawn. It took approx six months but saved about $1698 of fines. 

I still have one outstanding from the camera on Eastern freeway that is subject of class action. Have received info that they will contact me when they issue summons, that’s just on 12 months ago.

Thanks,

Robert.

Hi guys!
 
Thanks for your help, for your book and for everything you've done so far for me.

I was fighting infamous Wellington Bridge camera fine, went to Dandenong court for revocation of enforcement order, and not only revocation was granted, but I agreed to a "deal", to plead guilty in exchange of dismiss of all charges and fees.

Unfortunately, the demerit points apparently still stays, but it all is about stopping money flow trough the system.
 
Cheers...
 
Miroslaw


Please click here to read plenty more testimonials that we have received over the years.